Snider & Associates

Call Toll Free

  • Home
  • Firm Profile
    • Attorneys
    • Paralegals & Support Staff
  • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Discrimination
    • MSPB Representation
    • Overtime/Premium Pay
    • Federal Union Information
    • Federal Court Cases
    • Worker's Compensation
    • Personal Injury
    • Qui Tam/Whistleblower
    • Civil Litigation
  • Sample Cases
  • Library
    • Anatomy of a Case
    • FLRA and Arbitrator Decisions
    • Sample Motions and Briefs
    • Snider and Associates in the Press
    • Articles by Snider and Associates Attorneys and Paralegals
    • Fight for Your Rights by Michael J. Snider, Esq.
    • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
 

Federal Court Cases, Briefs and Decisions

Appearances in US Federal District and Circuit Court Cases

Hilda Elezovic v. Gordon R. England, C.A.4, Apr. 13, 2005, 05-1395

Elezovic v. England, Civil Rights: Employment (442), D.Md., Apr. 01, 2005, 1:05CV00905

Steven Allen, Et Al v. Hamm Et Al, Civil Rights: Employment (442), D.Md., Mar. 31, 2005, 1:05CV00879

Belyakov v. Thompson, Civil Rights: Employment (442), D.Md., Dec. 23, 2004, 8:04CV04008

American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Council 222 v. FLRA, C.A.D.C., Dec. 06, 2004, 04-1412

Farmer, Marvin V. Paige, Rod, C.A.D.C., Nov. 30, 2004, 04-5419

Murray V. Ohio Casualty Corporation Et Al, Labor: Fair Labor Standards Act (710), S.D.Ohio, Jun. 22, 2004, 2:04cv00539

Murray V. Ohio Casualty Corporation Et Al, Labor: Fair Labor Standards Act (710), D.D.C., Feb. 05, 2004, 1:04cv00180

Weliver v. Barnhart Et Al, Contract: Other Contract (190), D.Md., Dec. 30, 2003, 1:03cv03666

Pereira v. Potter, Civil Rights: Employment (442), N.D.Tex., Nov. 04, 2003, 3:03cv02684

Cartwright v. Potter, Civil Rights: Employment (442), W.D.N.C., Feb. 03, 2003, 1:03cv00026

Chappel, Et Al v. Tyco International, Et Al, Civil Rights: Employment (442), D.Md., Oct. 17, 2002, 1:02cv03400

Dilworth v. Jo Ann B. Barnhart, Civil Rights: Employment (442), S.D.Ind., Aug. 27, 2002, 1:02cv01328

Edmonson v. Potter, Civil Rights: Employment (442), D.Md., Aug. 22, 2002, 1:02cv02803

Darcangelo v. Verizon Maryland Inc., Civil Rights: Employment (442), D.Md., Mar. 15, 2002, 1:02cv00816

Rowe v. Mass Transit, Et Al, Civil Rights: Employment (442), D.Md., Jan. 22, 2002, 1:02cv00216

Smith v. Barnhart, Et Al, Civil Rights: Employment (442), D.Md., Sep. 10, 2001, 1:01cv02686

Holmes v. Apfel, C.A.9, Jul. 16, 1998, 98-56181

Koser v. Social Security Adm, C.A.9, Dec. 17, 1997, 97-36145

Briefs Filed in US Circuit Courts (Appellate)

Clara F. KOSER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee., (May 11, 1998), US Court of Appeals, 9th Cir.

James A. NICHOLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee., (Jan 29, 1998), US Court of Appeals, 11th Cir.

Robert BLANCHARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee., (1998), US Court of Appeals, 9th Cir.

Farmer, Marvin, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paige, Rod, Secretary of Education, Defendant - Appellee (2005); Ct of Appeals, D.C. Circuit

US Federal District Court Decisions (Table)

Darcangelo v. Verizon Maryland Inc., 2005 WL 1367083, (D.Md. Jun 07, 2005)

American Federation of Government Emp. v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 2005 WL 43030, (D.C.Cir. Jan 07, 2005)

Weliver v. Barnhart>, 316 F.Supp.2d 243, (D.Md. Mar 01, 2004)

Rowe v. Mass Transit Admin., 303 F.Supp.2d 596, (D.Md. Jul 28, 2003)

US Circuit Court of Appeals Cases

Carter v. Tate & Lyle, North America, 58 Fed.Appx. 12, (4th Cir.(Md.) Jan 16, 2003)

Edmonson v. Potter, 118 Fed.Appx. 726, (4th Cir.(Md.) Dec 22, 2004)

Holmes v. Apfel, C.A.9, Jul. 16, 1998, 98-56181

Koser v. Social Security Adm, C.A.9, Dec. 17, 1997, 97-36145

 
 
Name:
Telephone:
E-mail:
Message*

 
© 2013 - Snider & Associates, LLC | Disclaimer & Terms of Use : No information or materials posted herein are intended to constituted legal advice, nor can we guarantee the accuracy of posted information, especially as to each individual situation. Snider & Associates does not endorse any product, service, website, or firm. Visiting, getting information from or submitting a form through this site does not constitute formation of any attorney-client relationship; legal counsel should always be consulted. You should consult an attorney with regard to your individual circumstances and get any agreement in writing. The attorneys in our firm have bar admissions including state courts in Maryland, the District of Columbia, New York, Massachusetts, Florida, and Illinois. Our attorneys also hold among them admissions to the Federal District Courts for the Districts of Maryland, Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, Southern District of Florida, and District of Columbia; the Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit, Ninth Circuit, Federal Circuit, and the Supreme Court of The United States. Our attorneys are able to practice before Arbitrators, EEO Administrative Judges and MSPB Administrative Law Judges anywhere in the United States.